<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Synology Disk Station DS109J Review</title>
		<description>Comentarii legate de Synology Disk Station DS109J Review</description>
		<link>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:31:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.pcmhz.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/678/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Andrei a scris:</title>
			<link>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-816</link>
			<description><![CDATA[sunt de accord cu csaga]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:38:10 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-816</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>csaga a scris:</title>
			<link>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-719</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Viteza de transfer nu este prea buna, dar in rest este o bijuterie!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>csaga</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:00:51 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-719</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PCMHZ a scris:</title>
			<link>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-695</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Razvan: In primul rand as alege in functie de bugetul disponibil, diferentele de pret intre cele doua modele fiind considerabile. Pe portul USB bineinteles ca rezultatele sunt mai mari (bune) depinzand mai mult de performantele HDD-ului. Idem prin LAN Gigabit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PCMHZ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:23:52 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-695</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Razvan a scris:</title>
			<link>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-694</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Salut. Daca ar fi sa cumperi acum un NAS, ai alege 109j sau 109 care este mai scump, dar are performante mult mai bune. Si apopo, transferul prin USB (480 mbps) este mai mare deoarece nu este limitat la 100 mbps ca reteaua locala prin care ai facut testul (asta in cazul in care nu ai gigabit si vb prostii)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Razvan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:53:40 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.pcmhz.com/hardware-reviews/reviews-network/678-synology-disk-station-ds109j-review#comment-694</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

